Stopped and Searched 2

Posted 11 Dec 2009 by Walaa Idris

I blogged (Stopped and Searched) earlier this week, and today’s post is to clarify a few points that might have been vague on my earlier post.

I believe in personal freedom (it is one of the reasons I became a naturalised British) it is a freedom I paid dearly for and there is no price too high I will pay to preserve and protect it.

I think that the police have a job to do and unlike some might think, they do listen to us the public and hear what we have to say. Like most services feedback is important to them, as they strive to always deliver a better service. They are also the executor and not the legislator so pointing the figure at them will not resolve any legislative issues. Therefore, we need to point the figure at those we send to parliament to represent us and our interests. Those who in our name have put in place the intrusive rules and laws that we dislike so much. If we (the people) think that our national security can be achieved more effectively and efficiently without the laws as they are currently, then we need to communicate that feeling to our representatives so they can legislate laws we (the public) can comfortably live with and still be safe and protected.

The beliefs that the police should be able to sift the population and don’t stop “the sort of people who would NEVER be engaged in illegal activity”, as someone suggested, is called profiling. But we did not like it when only young black men (based on profiling) were continuously stopped and searched for knives and weapons, or when only Asian men were regularly stopped under the Anti- Terrorism Act. So what is the solution? How can we please the majority since it is impossible to please everyone? How can we profile without offending one group or miss the exceptions that don’t fit that profile? How can we be so diverse and tolerant yet so limited at the same time?

I know it is irritating and time consuming to be stopped for 10-15 minute on your way to work, but that is the law as it is now. And maybe we are unfairly blaming the police while all they are doing is implementing laws that our “elected” representatives has approved on our behalf. Perhaps it is time to amend and/or change the current laws and put in place laws and rules we the public feel safe and comfortable with.

We must in our dismay with things as they are now, remember that our front line service men and women are demoralised enough with all the nonsense this government keeps throwing at them and they can do with some compassion from us the public.

Categories: ,

2 comment(s)

It doesn't add up...

It doesn't add up...
12 Dec, 15:58

I guess this Daily Mail article will be more widely seen than your blog:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235241/The-picture-land-jail-How-police-Big-Brother-Britain-treat-like-terrorist-taking-holiday-snaps.html

The law permits, but does not require, the police to conduct Section 44 stops. It is a matter for Chief Constables to prioritise police actions, perhaps under direction from the Home Office, or exceptionally in the case of the Met, the Mayor of London additionally. For whatever reasons, these powers are being abused. There is more than a hint that the primary reason for this is precisely to make the general population feel under threat, and to cow them. Even reading about it in the newspaper will achieve that, while failing to deter the terrorist who understands the odds of intercept are negligible – especially if not disguised as an amateur photographer.

You raise the issue of profiling. With regard to random searches related to terrorism, it really is irrelevant, as they are almost completely ineffective in finding terrorists. Only where blanket searching is applied to everyone continuously can you hope to achieve anything through stop and search.

Search where there is a high probability of intercept is a different matter. That is probably the situation for knife crime in lawless estates, where profiling the culprits (many of whom are probably already known to the police socially if not for previous criminal convictions) is likely to be successful.

Walaa

Walaa
13 Dec, 16:55

It doesn’t add up, you are very correct in your guess, my blog is in its infancy and I am a long way for the Daily Mail readership numbers. Thank you for your comment and the link, and enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Commenting is closed for this article.